About Us Events Calendar Child Care Parenting Information Adoption Information Respite Care Disability Topics Lead Poisoning Home What is Early On? Where to find help for your child Childhood Development Early Childhood Early Literacy Preschool State & National Links Professional Development Downloadable Publications Medical Dictionary Child Health Vaccinations & Immunizations Search & Glossaries Bridges4Kids Great Parents/Great Start Early On Michigan Menu
 Where to find help for a child in Michigan, Anywhere in the U.S., or Canada
 

What's New? ~ Site Map ~ Translate

  Last Updated on 07/13/2018

House to Begin Work on Head Start Reauthorization

 
from CONGRESSMAN JOHN BOEHNER`S WEEKLY E-BULLETIN for MAY 30, 2003
[Congressman Boehner is the Republican Chair of the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce]

Last week, in response to President Bush's call for action to improve early childhood education, many of my colleagues on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce and I unveiled legislation that would strengthen the academic components of the federal Head Start program for disadvantaged children and encourage states to maintain or increase funding for early childhood education. The bill - entitled the School Readiness Act of 2003 - focuses on reducing the "readiness gap" that exists between Head Start graduates and their more affluent peers when they reach kindergarten.

The simple truth is that children in Head Start are learning, but they aren't learning as much as they deserve to be learning. Head Start children deserve the chance to enter kindergarten at the same level as other children their age do, but that isn't happening. The current system is giving these children a head start, but it isn't giving them the best start possible.

Studies show that while children in Head Start show improvement, they still leave the program with skills and knowledge levels far below national averages for U.S. children. As a result of this "readiness gap," Head Start children are not being adequately prepared for school in key areas of cognitive development that have been shown to be critical for later school success.

Make no mistake, Head Start is a great program that is capable of achieving even greater results. But we should not be content with giving these children anything less than the best this nation can offer. If we simply settle for the status quo in Head Start, we'll be leaving the job unfinished for hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged children.

To close the readiness gap and strengthen Head Start, the School Readiness Act would:

- EMPHASIZE WHAT WORKS IN PREPARING DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN FOR SCHOOL. The proposal would strengthen Head Start's academic standards by emphasizing cognitive development and the results of scientifically-based research in topics critical to children's school readiness (including language, pre-reading, pre-mathematics, and English language acquisition). The changes would be similar to those adopted with strong bipartisan support for President Bush's Reading First and Early Reading First initiatives, established in the No Child Left Behind Act for K-12 education.

- REQUIRE NO NEW TESTING. The proposal would maintain current law with respect to regular local assessments of the academic progress being made by children enrolled in Head Start. No new testing would be mandated under the bill. Local Head Start grantees would be subject to the same three-year review ("triennial review") process as they are under current law, but would be evaluated based on criteria that are more straightforward and reflective of the progress being made in preparing children for school.

- ENSURE THAT LOCAL HEAD START CENTERS ARE FAIRLY EVALUATED ON THEIR PERFORMANCE. The bill would eliminate "performance measures" in current law that are arbitrary and do not adequately gauge children's progress. These flawed measures would be replaced by a more straightforward system that takes into account a child's progress in key areas relating to school readiness, better enabling parents and teachers to know how each child is progressing.

- IMPROVE TEACHER QUALITY IN HEAD START. The bill would ensure that a greater number of Head Start teachers are adequately trained and educated in early childhood development, particularly in teaching the fundamental skills of language, pre-reading, and pre-mathematics. It would require all new Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree in early childhood education or a related field within three years, and 50 percent of Head Start teachers nationwide to have at least a bachelors degree by 2008. These provisions will help to meet a goal set recently by the National Head Start Association, which called for 75 percent of all Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree by 2005, and for all Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree by 2008.

- PRESERVE ALL CURRENT HEALTH AND NUTRITION SERVICES FOR HEAD START CHILDREN. While the academic components of Head Start would be strengthened, all existing health and nutrition-related components of Head Start would be preserved and extended.

- KEEP HEAD START IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.

- PROVIDE INCENTIVES FOR STATES TO MAINTAIN OR EXPAND FUNDING FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION. As many states confront budget difficulties, some are reducing (or considering reducing) their spending on early childhood education programs. To provide an incentive for states to continue investing in early childhood education, the School Readiness Act would create a limited demonstration project by which a limited number of states could voluntarily apply for and receive the option of coordinating Head Start programs with their own early childhood education programs, in exchange for an agreement to maintain or expand funding for early childhood education. The "state demo" would be limited to states with a demonstrated investment in early childhood education and an established, pre- existing preschool system. Participating states would be barred from making funding cuts to early childhood education programs as a condition of their participation. In addition, a "hold harmless" provision is included guaranteeing funding for Head Start centers in participating states during the first year of implementation of the demonstration project.

- SHIELD HEAD START AND OTHER EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION PROGRAMS AGAINST STATE BUDGET CUTS. The bill would effectively "wall off" early childhood education funding in states that choose to participate in the state demonstration program. Under the bill, a state participating in the demonstration project would be required to maintain or expand its financial commitment to early childhood education to qualify for participation. Participating states would not be permitted to use early childhood funds for anything other than Head Start and early childhood education.

- INCREASE HEAD START FUNDING. The bill would authorize a $203 million increase in funding for Head Start - to $6.87 billion, meaning Head Start funding will have nearly doubled in the past seven years. Funding for Head Start in FY 1996, the first fiscal year under a Republican-led House, was approximately $3.8 billion. The bill would also authorize a separate $5 million to provide additional administrative support to states who are selected to participate in the state demonstration program. This money would be a one-time allotment to help such states coordinate Head Start with their state initiatives.

I look forward to working with my colleagues on the committee and in the full House as we work to reauthorize Head Start this year. We've got a solid measure to work with, and I expect a productive and spirited debate.

 

 

 

© 2002-2018 Bridges4Kids - Report a Bad Link